Group Administration Premium Services, Inc., et al. - Page 28

                                       - 28 -                                         

          corporations.  The burden is on petitioner to prove his basis in            
          the corporations at the time of the distributions.15                        
               On the GAPS Schedule L, $1,000 is shown as petitioner’s                
          original capital contribution.  Respondent has conceded this                
          amount, so petitioner's basis in GAPS is at least $1,000.                   
          Petitioner claims that he lent the proceeds of two bank accounts,           
          totaling $154,000, to GAPS.  While we have found that these                 
          amounts were not loans, we do believe that petitioner transferred           
          these accounts to GAPS.  However, petitioner has failed to prove            
          that he had a sufficient interest in the funds in these accounts            
          to give him any basis in the accounts, or in his GAPS stock after           


          15Petitioners, in their reply brief, argued that respondent                 
          has the burden of proof on the issue of petitioner's basis                  
          because this is a new issue raised by respondent.  However, we              
          disagree with petitioners' contention that this is a new issue.             
          Respondent, in her statutory notice, determined that this case              
          dealt with GAPS's and JJM's constructive dividends.  The                    
          statutory notice did not address petitioner's basis in the                  
          corporations because respondent assumed that earnings and profits           
          were sufficient to cover the amount of distributions.  After                
          concessions, it became clear that this was not the case.  This              
          change in the factual framework does not render the issue of                
          petitioner's basis a new issue.  The issue of corporate                     
          distributions, which is the broad issue in this case, encompasses           
          the need to determine petitioner's basis in the corporation.                
          Sec. 301, the controlling Code section, requires knowledge of a             
          taxpayer's basis in the corporation in order to determine the               
          taxpayer's return of capital and capital gain.  Once the issue of           
          corporate distributions was raised in the statutory notice, the             
          burden was on petitioners to prove all the facts relevant to that           
          inquiry.  This not only included the burden of proving loans,               
          which petitioners spent most of their efforts on, but it also               
          included the burden of proving the amounts of the corporate                 
          distributions, the corporations' earnings and profits, and                  
          petitioner's basis in the corporations.                                     




Page:  Previous  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011