- 5 -
never responded to either the letter or the telephone call. On
September 2 and 3, 1993, respondent mailed to Attorney Riley
interrogatories for the Gaskins and for the Quinns, respectively.
By letter dated September 14, 1993, respondent reminded Attorney
Riley of the outstanding interrogatories and of the attempts to
schedule a meeting. On September 15, 1993, respondent mailed to
Attorney Riley requests for production of documents. On
September 23, 1993, respondent filed with the Court and mailed to
Attorney Riley her first sets of requests for admissions. On
October 21, 1993, Attorney Riley mailed the respective answers to
respondent's first sets of requests for admissions.
Attorney Riley having failed to respond to the requests for
answers to interrogatories and production of documents,
respondent, on October 25, 1993, filed motions to compel
responses to respondent's interrogatories and to impose sanctions
and motions to compel responses to respondent's requests for
production of documents and to impose sanctions. By orders dated
October 26 and 27, 1993, the Court granted these motions as to
the Quinns and the Gaskins, respectively. The sanctions portions
of those motions were deferred to the trial session.
Attorney Riley had mailed responses to respondent's
interrogatories and requests for documents on October 21, 1993.
In such responses, petitioners objected to answering most of
respondent's interrogatories designed to elicit information on
the innocent spouse claim on the ground that providing such
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011