William C. and Elaine Gaskins - Page 15

                                       - 15 -                                         
          Wilfong v. United States, 991 F.2d 359, 364 (7th Cir. 1993);                
          Sokol v. Commissioner, 92 T.C. 760, 765 (1989); Wasie v.                    
          Commissioner, 86 T.C. 962, 968-969 (1986).  The reasonableness of           
          respondent's position necessarily requires considering what                 
          respondent knew at the time she took the position and the events            
          that occurred afterwards.  See Rutana v. Commissioner, 88 T.C.              
          1329, 1334 (1987); Don Casey Co. v. Commissioner, 87 T.C. 847,              
          862 (1986); DeVenney v. Commissioner, 85 T.C. 927, 930 (1985).              
               To establish eligibility for innocent spouse relief, a                 
          taxpayer must establish that:  (1) A joint Federal income tax               
          return was filed; (2) there is a substantial understatement of              
          tax attributable to grossly erroneous items of the other spouse;            
          (3) in signing the return, the alleged innocent spouse did not              
          know, and had no reason to know, of the substantial                         
          understatement; and (4) taking into account all the facts and               
          circumstances, it would be inequitable to hold the alleged                  
          innocent spouse liable for the deficiency attributable to such              
          substantial understatement.  Sec. 6013(e)(1).  At issue in these            
          cases were items (3) and (4) above.                                         
               Factors to be considered in determining whether the spouse             
          had reason to know are:  the alleged innocent spouse's level of             
          education; the spouse's involvement in the family's business and            
          financial affairs; the presence of expenditures that appear                 
          lavish or unusual when compared to the family's past levels of              






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011