William C. and Elaine Gaskins - Page 7

                                        - 7 -                                         
          of the trial date and indicating respondent would seek a default            
          judgment or move to dismiss for failure properly to prosecute if            
          Attorney Riley continued to fail to cooperate.                              
               On May 12, 1994, respondent mailed her trial memorandum to             
          the Court and to Attorney Riley.  Attorney Riley did not prepare            
          a trial memorandum.  On June 2, 1994, Attorney Riley contacted              
          respondent's counsel indicating he would be out of town until               
          late on June 3, 1994.  Respondent's counsel offered to meet                 
          during the weekend of June 4 and 5, 1994, but Attorney Riley                
          failed to contact him.                                                      
               At the calendar call of the trial session on June 6, 1994,             
          there were no stipulations of fact by the parties, no exchanges             
          of documents, and no trial memorandum from petitioners.  The                
          Court's Standing Pre-Trial Order requires the parties to meet and           
          to stipulate under Rule 91 "to the maximum extent possible".  The           
          Standing Pre-Trial Order also requires the parties to exchange              
          trial memoranda (including their witness lists and copies of all            
          documents to be offered at trial that have not been stipulated              
          to) 15 days before the calendar call of the trial session.                  
          Respondent's counsel had complied to the extent that he could do            
          so unilaterally.  Attorney Riley appeared at the calendar call              
          but had not complied with the Court's Standing Pre-Trial Order.             
          Instead, Attorney Riley filed a motion for continuance which the            








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011