- 2 - MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION CHABOT, Judge: Respondent determined deficiencies in Federal individual income tax1 against petitioners as follows: Year Deficiency 1989 $10,286 1990 11,652 After concessions by both sides,2 the issue for decision is whether petitioner Paul E. Hathaway, hereinafter sometimes referred to as Hathaway, a traveling sales representative, was a common law employee, a statutory employee, or an independent contractor in 1989 and 1990. 1 Of the total deficiencies determined, $9,023 for 1989 and $9,414 for 1990 are alternative minimum tax under sec. 55; the remaining amounts are income tax under sec. 1. Unless indicated otherwise, all section and subtitle references are to sections and subtitles of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as in effect for the years in issue. 2 The parties reached the following agreements. For 1989, if respondent's determination is sustained, then (1) petitioners may claim a Schedule C expense deduction in the amount of $15,551 (see sec. 62(a)(2)), (2) petitioners may claim on Schedule C cost of goods sold in the amount of $8,260, (3) petitioners may claim a net (i.e., after subtracting 2 percent of adjusted gross income) Schedule A business expense deduction in the amount of $58,469, and (4) petitioners may claim a Schedule A medical expense deduction in the amount of $615.23. For 1990, if respondent's determination is sustained, then (1) petitioners may claim a Schedule C expense deduction in the amount of $10,270, (2) petitioners may claim a Schedule A interest expense deduction in the amount of $109, and (3) petitioners may claim a net Schedule A business expense deduction in the amount of $68,110.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011