Highland Farms, Inc. and Subsidiary - Page 18

                                       - 18 -                                         
          the next 19 years in accordance with the schedule provided to the           
          residents as part of the rental contract, reducing account 262              
          accordingly.  Similarly, for Federal income tax purposes,                   
          petitioner reported as income these same portions of the entry              
          fees for the apartments and the lodge as they became                        
          nonrefundable or nonforfeitable within that tax year.                       
               As of January 1, 1988, account 261 had a balance of                    
          $578,038, and account 262 had a balance of $1,066,982, for a                
          total of $1,645,020.  As of December 31, 1988, account 261 had a            
          balance of $628,577, and account 262 a balance of $1,131,830, for           
          a total of $1,760,407.  Thus, during 1988, the accounts had net             
          increases of $50,539, and $64,848, respectively, for a total net            
          increase that year of $115,387.                                             
               In its books, petitioner recorded 6 percent of the cluster             
          home receipts as income in the year received and credited the               
          remaining 94 percent to an account designated as "Liability for             
          Repurchase".  Petitioner's books treated a total of 24 percent of           
          the purchase price as income over a 7-year period, with                     
          corresponding reductions in the liability account, as follows:  6           
          percent in year 1 and 3 percent per year in years 2 through 7.              
          The liability for repurchase account was never reduced below 76             
          percent of the original purchase price of the cluster home.                 
               For Federal income tax purposes, petitioner did not treat              
          the cluster home transactions as sales.  Petitioner reported the            
          proceeds from the cluster home transactions in accordance with              
          that year's reductions in petitioner's "liability for repurchase"           
          amounts.  Petitioner also claimed depreciation deductions on the            



Page:  Previous  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011