Highland Farms, Inc. and Subsidiary - Page 25

                                       - 25 -                                         
          or merely a loan with a security interest focuses on the intent             
          of the parties and not the form of the transaction."  Redic v.              
          Gary H. Watts Realty Co., 762 F.2d 1181, 1185 (4th Cir. 1985)               
          (citing O'Briant v. Lee, 214 N.C. 723, 200 S.E. 865 (1939)).  The           
          intention to create a mortgage must be established, not by simple           
          declaration of the parties, but by proof of the facts and                   
          circumstances outside the deed which are inconsistent with an               
          absolute purchase.  Redic v. Gary H. Watts Realty Co., supra at             
          1186; O'Briant v. Lee, 214 N.C. at 731, 200 S.E. at 870.                    
               The North Carolina Supreme Court has identified six factors            
          to be considered in determining whether a transaction is a sale             
          or a loan:                                                                  
               (1) whether there was a debtor-creditor relationship                   
               created at the time of the transaction * * *; (2)                      
               whether the "grantor" remains in possession or whether                 
               the grantee takes immediate possession of the property                 
               * * *; (3) whether the "grantor" was under distress and                
               hard-pressed for money at the time of the transaction                  
               * * *; (4) whether the transaction originated out of an                
               application for a loan * * *; (5) whether the purported                
               sale price is less than the net worth of the property                  
               * * *; and (6) whether the "grantor" was obligated to                  
               exercise the "option to repurchase."  * * *                            
          Redic v. Gary H. Watts Realty Co., supra at 1186 (citations                 
          omitted).                                                                   
               In deciding whether a transaction constitutes a sale for tax           
          purposes, this Court considers whether the burdens and benefits             
          of ownership have passed to the purported purchaser; this is a              
          question of fact to be ascertained from the intentions of the               
          parties as evidenced by the written agreements read in the light            
          of the attending facts and circumstances.  Grodt & McKay Realty,            
          Inc. v. Commissioner, 77 T.C. 1221, 1237 (1981).  Factors                   



Page:  Previous  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011