- 28 - 448(d)(5) is ambiguous as to the meaning of "experience". We next look to the statute's legislative history in an attempt to ascertain congressional intent. Does the Legislative History Clearly Reveal Congressional Intent as to the Formula To Apply? Petitioners maintain that the legislative history of section 448(d)(5) does not clearly reveal Congress' intent as to the proper formula to apply. A description of the nonaccrual- experience method formula is contained only in the report of the Committee on Way and Means.12 Because that report contains conflicting language, we do not think it clearly describes the formula. H. Rept. 99-426, at 608 (1985), 1986-3 C.B. (Vol. 2) 1, 608, states in pertinent part as follows: Amount of accrual The committee bill provides that an accrual basis taxpayer need not accrue as income any portion of amounts billed for the performance of services which, on the basis of experience, it will not collect. * * * The amount of billings that, on the basis of experience, will not be collected is equal to the total amount billed, multiplied by a fraction whose numerator is the total amount of such receivables which were billed and determined not to be collectible within the most recent five years taxable years [sic] of the 12 A provision comparable to sec. 448(d)(5) was not present in the Senate amendment, and the conference report does not describe the nonaccrual-experience method formula. See H. Conf. Rept. 99- 841 (Vol. 2), at II-285 to II-289 (1986), 1986-3 C.B. (Vol. 4) 1, 285-289.Page: Previous 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011