Hospital Corporation of America and Subsidiaries - Page 33

                                       - 33 -                                         
          concluded erroneously interpreted the statute, he was entitled to           
          alter his interpretation of the statute on further reflection.              
          Rust v. Sullivan, 500 U.S. 173, 186 (1991); Chevron U.S.A., Inc.            
          v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc., supra at 862; Peoples Fed.              
          Sav. & Loan Association v. Commissioner, supra at 302.                      
               The Secretary's rationale for the amendment to the                     
          nonaccrual-experience formula is revealed in the preamble to the            
          Secretary's Decision announcing the modification:                           
                    Under the nonaccrual-experience method of accounting,             
               the portion of a receivable that is considered uncollectible           
               and not required to be accrued is the product of the                   
               receivable and a fraction representing the taxpayer's bad              
               debt experience.  The numerator of the fraction is the                 
               taxpayer's bad debts for the taxpayer's current and five               
               preceding taxable years, and the denominator of the fraction           
               is the taxpayer's accounts receivable for the same six-year            
               period.  The Internal Revenue Service has received questions           
               from taxpayers as to whether the denominator of the fraction           
               is determined on the basis of (i) total accounts receivable            
               earned throughout the six-year period (i.e., the total                 
               amount of sales resulting in accounts receivable throughout            
               the period) or (ii) yearend balances of the accounts                   
               receivable over the six-year period.  These regulations                
               provide that the denominator is based on total accounts                
               receivable earned throughout the period ending at the close            
               of the six-year period.  This interpretation is consistent             
               with the legislative history of the Act which provides that            
               "[t]he amount of billings that, on the basis of experience,            
               will not be collected is equal to the total amount billed,             
               multiplied by a fraction whose numerator is the total amount           
               of such receivables which were billed and determined not to            
               be collectible within the most recent five taxable years of            
               the taxpayer, and whose denominator is the total of such               
               amounts billed within the same five year period."  H.R. Rep.           
               No. 99-426, 99th Cong., 1st Sess. 606 (1985).  [T.D. 8194,             
               1988-1 C.B. 186.15]                                                    



          15  Additionally, as stated above, petitioners agree that the               
          relevant legislative history is ambiguous.                                  



Page:  Previous  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011