Pennel Phlander Irwin - Page 12

                                                 - 12 -                                                   
            insurance.  Section 280A(a) provides that, generally, taxpayers                               
            may not deduct expenses (that are otherwise allowable) with                                   
            respect to the use of a dwelling unit that also serves as the                                 
            taxpayer's residence during the taxable year.  There are several                              
            exceptions to this rule.  The limitations imposed by section 280A                             
            do not apply to expenses attributable to any portion of a                                     
            taxpayer's dwelling unit used both exclusively and on a regular                               
            basis as the principal place of petitioner's trade or business.                               
            Sec. 280A(c)(1)(A).  In the present instance, respondent argues                               
            that petitioner has failed to show that the business use of his                               
            residence was regular and exclusive.                                                          
                  In order for a taxpayer to establish use on a "regular"                                 
            basis, the business use must be more than occasional or                                       
            incidental.  Jackson v. Commissioner, 76 T.C. 696, 700 (1981).  A                             
            taxpayer "exclusively" uses a portion of his dwelling in a trade                              
            or business if the portion in question is not used for other than                             
            business purposes.  Sec. 1.280A-2(g)(1), Proposed Income Tax                                  
            Regs., 45 Fed. Reg. 52404 (Aug. 7, 1980); Hefti v. Commissioner,                              
            T.C. Memo. 1993-128.  Petitioner has not offered sufficient                                   
            evidence regarding the amount of time and nature of the work                                  
            conducted at his home to establish regular use.  Browning v.                                  
            Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1988-293, affd. 890 F.2d 1084 (9th Cir.                              
            1989).  Furthermore, petitioner has failed to prove that any                                  
            portion of his home was used exclusively for his writing                                      






Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011