William Kale - Page 8

                                        - 8 -                                         
          District of Pennsylvania for one count of conspiracy to defraud             
          the United States under 18 U.S.C. sec. 371 (1994) and one count             
          of aiding and abetting the bribery of a public official under 18            
          U.S.C. sec. 201(b) (1994).                                                  
               In count one of the indictment the grand jury charged                  
          petitioner of conspiring with Toll and Suval to defraud the                 
          United States.  The object of the conspiracy was for petitioner             
          and Suval to receive bribes from Toll in return for conducting              
          inadequate examinations of the Cynwyd Group’s tax returns.  Among           
          the 55 overt acts contained in count one of the indictment were             
          the following: (1) Petitioner's meeting with Toll at various                
          times to discuss examination of specific Cynwyd Group returns;              
          (2) petitioner’s causing the IRS to issue certain clearance                 
          letters; (3) Toll's meeting with Suval at various times to                  
          discuss the examination of various Cynwyd Group returns; (4)                
          Suval’s causing the IRS to issue certain clearance letters; (5)             
          Toll's making payments to Suval.                                            
               In its instructions to the jury at petitioner’s criminal               
          trial concerning the count of conspiracy, the court stated as               
          follows:                                                                    
                    In order to meet the burden of proof as to                        
               * * *[the Count of conspiracy] against * * *                           
               [petitioner], there are five things that the                           
               Government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt:                       
                    First, that the conspiracy described in the Bill                  
               of Indictment was formed and was existing at or about                  
               the times that are alleged;                                            
                    Secondly, that * * * [petitioner] intentionally,                  
               willfully, became a member of that conspiracy;                         



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011