Edward and Ruth Kelly - Page 25

                                                 - 25 -                                                   

            Sec. 1.6662-2(d)(1), Income Tax Regs.  Under these regulations,                               
            disclosure is adequate if and only if it is made on Form 8275 (or                             
            Form 8275-R).  Secs. 1.6662-3(c)(2) and -4(f)(1), Income Tax                                  
            Regs.  Petitioners did not file Form 8275 for 1991 or 1992.7  For                             
            returns due prior to the effective date of sections 1.6662-3(c),                              
            and -4(f), Income Tax Regs., taxpayers were entitled to rely on                               
            Notice 90-20, 1990-1 C.B. 328, as authority for the adequate                                  
            disclosure exception.  Closely tracking the language of the                                   
            legislative history that directed the Secretary to provide for                                
            such an exception, Notice 90-20 states that "disclosure must be                               
            full and substantive and be clearly identified as being made to                               
            avoid imposition of the accuracy-related penalty."  Id. at 329;                               
            H. Rept. 101-247 at 1393 (1989).  Disclosure may be made on Form                              
            8275.  Alternatively, it may be made on the return, in which case                             
            the front page of the return must bear the caption "DISCLOSURE                                
            MADE UNDER SECTION 6662."  Id.  Petitioners' returns for 1989 and                             
            1990 did not comply with these requirements and no Forms 8275                                 



            7For the first time in his reply brief, Mr. Kelly challenges                                  
            the validity of these regulations on the ground that they exceed                              
            the scope of the Secretary's interpretive authority.  Mr. Kelly                               
            evidently believes that the conditions in the regulations for                                 
            adequate disclosure are too restrictive.  The argument was raised                             
            too late for consideration.  Aero Rental v. Commissioner, 64 T.C.                             
            331, 338 (1975).  We note in passing, however, that as the                                    
            statute itself provides no exception to the negligence penalty                                
            for adequate disclosure, we fail to see how invalidating the                                  
            regulations would serve petitioners' interest.                                                




Page:  Previous  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011