Edward and Ruth Kelly - Page 27

                                                 - 27 -                                                   

            v. Commissioner, 94 T.C. 126, 142 (1990), affd. 992 F.2d 1132                                 
            (11th Cir. 1993); Douglas v. Commissioner, 86 T.C. 758, 763                                   
            (1986); Purcell v. Commissioner, 86 T.C. 228, 240 (1986), affd.                               
            826 F.2d 470 (6th Cir. 1987).                                                                 
                  Mrs. Kelly took the position that both the employee business                            
            expense deductions and the ordinary loss deductions were not only                             
            plainly without merit, but "phony".  She argued that in view of                               
            Shearson Lehman's reimbursement policy, "If * * * the claimed                                 
            unreimbursed expenses had a factual basis, there is no logical                                
            explanation why they were not reimbursed.  * * *  The logical                                 
            inference from the failure to seek reimbursement or, if it was                                
            sought, to obtain it, is that the claimed expenses were never                                 
            incurred or were not business-related."  An alternative                                       
            explanation, however, is that the expenses were not reimbursed                                
            by Mr. Kelly's employer, or that Mr. Kelly did not seek                                       
            reimbursement, for the same reason that the deductions were                                   
            disallowed by respondent, a failure to substantiate.8  Failure to                             
            substantiate adequately does not, by itself, prove that the                                   
            expenses were fictitious or were nondeductible personal expenses.                             


            8It is not uncommon for employees to refrain from pursuing                                    
            claims for reimbursement to which they would be entitled under                                
            the employer's policy, believing it impolitic to do so in view of                             
            the nature or amount of the relevant expenses.  There is nothing                              
            in the record that would rule this out as another possible                                    
            explanation for why Mr. Kelly might not have obtained                                         
            reimbursement in spite of having genuinely incurred business-                                 
            related expenses.                                                                             




Page:  Previous  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011