- 27 - v. Commissioner, 94 T.C. 126, 142 (1990), affd. 992 F.2d 1132 (11th Cir. 1993); Douglas v. Commissioner, 86 T.C. 758, 763 (1986); Purcell v. Commissioner, 86 T.C. 228, 240 (1986), affd. 826 F.2d 470 (6th Cir. 1987). Mrs. Kelly took the position that both the employee business expense deductions and the ordinary loss deductions were not only plainly without merit, but "phony". She argued that in view of Shearson Lehman's reimbursement policy, "If * * * the claimed unreimbursed expenses had a factual basis, there is no logical explanation why they were not reimbursed. * * * The logical inference from the failure to seek reimbursement or, if it was sought, to obtain it, is that the claimed expenses were never incurred or were not business-related." An alternative explanation, however, is that the expenses were not reimbursed by Mr. Kelly's employer, or that Mr. Kelly did not seek reimbursement, for the same reason that the deductions were disallowed by respondent, a failure to substantiate.8 Failure to substantiate adequately does not, by itself, prove that the expenses were fictitious or were nondeductible personal expenses. 8It is not uncommon for employees to refrain from pursuing claims for reimbursement to which they would be entitled under the employer's policy, believing it impolitic to do so in view of the nature or amount of the relevant expenses. There is nothing in the record that would rule this out as another possible explanation for why Mr. Kelly might not have obtained reimbursement in spite of having genuinely incurred business- related expenses.Page: Previous 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011