Edward and Ruth Kelly - Page 30

                                                 - 30 -                                                   

            options provided an arguably colorable--albeit incorrect--basis                               
            for the position taken on the joint returns.                                                  
                  There is no evidence that the deductions were frivolous,                                
            fraudulent, phony, or otherwise so groundless as to be grossly                                
            erroneous.  Accordingly, the substantial understatements for the                              
            taxable years at issue were not attributable to grossly erroneous                             
                        items.  We need not consider the other requirements for                           
            innocent spouse relief.9                                                                      
                  In view of the foregoing,                                                               

            Decision will be entered                                                                      
            under Rule 155 in docket No.                                                                  
            28233-91, and decision will be                                                                
            entered for respondent in                                                                     
            docket No. 7795-94.                                                                           






            9After the reply briefs in these cases had been filed, the                                    
            Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit decided Resser v.                                    
            Commissioner, 74 F.3d 1528 (7th Cir. 1996), revg. and remanding                               
            T.C. Memo. 1994-241.  By letter, counsel for Mrs. Kelly called                                
            the decision to our attention in the belief that the facts were                               
            in some respects similar to those of these cases.  Since neither                              
            this Court nor the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit                                   
            decided whether the understatement in that case resulted from                                 
            grossly erroneous items, and the case has been remanded to this                               
            Court for further findings on that issue, we leave for another                                
            day any discussion of the opinion of the Court of Appeals for the                             
            Seventh Circuit in Resser.                                                                    




Page:  Previous  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  

Last modified: May 25, 2011