- 25 - dividends per share than First Commerce, and had no long-term debt. Respondent's experts said that investors would value Scottsbluff National Corp. at a higher multiple of earnings and percentage of book value per share than First Commerce. Respondent's experts estimated that shares of First National of Nebraska stock traded at 86 percent of its book value per share on December 31, 1986. They noted that First National of Nebraska was larger, more diversified, more profitable, and had better income growth than Scottsbluff National Corp. They said that the market would value Scottsbluff National Corp. at a lower percentage of book value per share than First National of Nebraska. Despite that conclusion, respondent’s experts estimated, using the market method, that Scottsbluff National Corp. stock would sell at 125 percent of book value per share. They did not explain this inconsistency. Using a market method, they concluded that a 100-percent stock interest in Scottsbluff National was worth $18.8 million on September 30, 1986, and March 31, 1987. As discussed above, respondent's experts valued a stock interest in Scottsbluff National Corp. at $19.2 million under an income method. They concluded that the fair market value of a 100-percent stock interest in Scottsbluff National Corp. was $19 million on September 30, 1986, and March 31, 1987. Respondent's experts applied a 15-percent minority interest discount and a 10-percent discount for lack of marketability inPage: Previous 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011