Gary L. Lonsinger and Nancy L. Lonsinger - Page 6

                                        - 6 -                                         

               On their 1990 Federal income tax return, petitioners claimed           
          a $100,000 casualty loss.  This amount represented the difference           
          between petitioners' estimate of the PEDRO's fair market value of           
          $475,000 before the casualty, and petitioners' estimate of the              
          PEDRO's fair market value of $265,000 immediately after the                 
          casualty, which petitioners then further reduced by the $110,000            
          insurance recovery to arrive at the $100,000 casualty loss                  
          figure.                                                                     
               On May 22, 1991, petitioners filed Form 1045 (Application              
          for Tentative Refund) carrying back their 1990 net operating loss           
          to the tax years 1987 and 1988.                                             
               On September 4, 1991, William Hodgens, Director, Northrop              
          and Johnson, advised by letter that, due to a number of factors             
          itemized in the letter (some of which related to the damage                 
          suffered by the PEDRO), "I feel a realistic market value for                
          PEDRO is in the area of $285,000.00 to $320,000.00."                        
                                       OPINION                                        
               Respondent concedes that petitioners incurred a casualty               
          loss as a result of the partial sinking of the PEDRO on February            
          7, 1989, but contends that the loss, if any, was sustained in               
          1994, and not in 1990, as claimed by petitioners.  Respondent               
          argues that it was not until 1994, when the lawsuit against                 
          Pedro-Holland was resolved, that petitioners knew whether or not            
          they would be further compensated.  Respondent also challenges              





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011