Lumber City Corporation, f.k.a. Neiman-Reed Lumber and Supply Company, Inc. - Page 29

                                       - 29 -                                         

          28, 1987, is entirely reasonable given the magnitude of the turn-           
          around he thereby achieved for petitioner during that year.20  It           
          also is entirely reasonable that petitioner desired to sustain              
          its turnaround and attempted to maximize its chances of doing so            
          by requiring Mr. Ruf to continue to provide services to it during           
          the three fiscal years following its fiscal year ended February             
          28, 1987.21                                                                 
               We further find, based on our examination of the entire                
          record before us (including the testimony of Mr. Lyons and Mr.              
          Ruf, both of whom we found credible on this issue), that peti-              

          20  On the present record, we reject respondent's contention that           
          Mr. Ruf was not undercompensated during petitioner's fiscal year            
          ended Feb. 28, 1987, because he received an option to purchase              
          petitioner's stock.  Respondent did not determine that the                  
          receipt of that option resulted in taxable compensation to Mr.              
          Ruf.  Nor did she present any evidence to show that the purchase            
          price paid for all of petitioner's stock was less than the fair             
          market value of that stock.  Although the stock option was                  
          offered to Mr. Ruf in an effort to cause him to decide to join              
          petitioner, it does not necessarily follow that the amount of               
          reasonable compensation that petitioner may deduct for Mr. Ruf's            
          services during its taxable year ended Feb. 28, 1987, is affected           
          by Mr. Ruf's receipt of that option.                                        

          21  On the instant record, we reject respondent's contention                
          that, because the $1,500,000 of compensation that petitioner was            
          to accrue under the 1987 deferred compensation arrangement in               
          equal installments of $500,000 for each of its fiscal years ended           
          Feb. 29, 1988, Feb. 28, 1989, and Feb. 28, 1990, was payable                
          "provided only that Jesse Ruf shall complete twelve (12) calendar           
          months of employment during each" of such fiscal years, petition-           
          er awarded the $933,333 of compensation it paid under that                  
          arrangement exclusively for services Mr. Ruf provided during its            
          fiscal years ended Feb. 29, 1988, and Feb. 28, 1989.                        






Page:  Previous  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011