Patricia S. Makalintal - Page 24

                                       - 24 -                                         
               Further, in light of the frequent physical abuse by                    
          Mr. Makalintal and Mr. Makalintal’s general refusal to discuss              
          his business and financial affairs with petitioner, we believe              
          that petitioner's inquiry was reasonable and sufficient to                  
          satisfy her duty of inquiry with regard to the taxable income               
          reported on Mr. Makalintal's and her 1986, 1987, and 1988 joint             
          Federal income tax returns.  See Price v. Commissioner, supra at            
          966.                                                                        
               The final element in considering whether petitioner                    
          qualifies for innocent spouse relief is whether, in light of all            
          of the facts and circumstances, it would be inequitable to hold             
          petitioner liable for the alleged understatement for 1986                   
          relating to the sale of the ICPI stock and for the substantial              
          understatements for 1987 and 1988 that we have sustained relating           
          to the deposits into Mr. Makalintal and petitioner’s bank                   
          accounts.  Sec. 6013(e)(1)(D); Flynn v. Commissioner, 93 T.C.               
          355, 367 (1989); sec. 1.6013-5(b), Income Tax Regs.  This issue             
          turns largely on the question of whether petitioner benefited               
          directly or indirectly from the understatements of tax.  Flynn v.           
          Commissioner, supra at 367; Bell v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo.                
          1989-107; sec. 1.6013-5(b), Income Tax Regs.  Normal support of a           
          spouse and children is not regarded as a significant benefit and            
          is to be considered in light of the circumstances of the parties.           
          Sanders v. United States, 509 F.2d 162, 168 (5th Cir. 1975);                
          Flynn v. Commissioner, supra at 367; Bell v. Commissioner, supra.           




Page:  Previous  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011