Arnold P. Mordkin and Cindy Mordkin - Page 57

                                       - 57 -                                         
          T.C. 686, 699 (1988), affd. 893 F.2d 656 (4th Cir. 1990).  The              
          term "disregard" includes any careless, reckless, or intentional            
          disregard of the Code and the temporary or final regulations is-            
          sued thereunder.  Sec. 6662(c); sec. 1.6662-3(b)(2), Income Tax             
          Regs.                                                                       
               The accuracy-related penalty under 6662(a) does not apply to           
          any portion of an underpayment if it is shown that there was a              
          reasonable cause for such portion and that the taxpayer acted in            
          good faith with respect to such portion.  Sec. 6664(c)(1).  The             
          determination of whether the taxpayer acted with reasonable cause           
          and in good faith depends upon the pertinent facts and circum-              
          stances.  Sec. 1.6664-4(b)(1), Income Tax Regs.  Factors taken              
          into account include the taxpayer's efforts to assess his or her            
          proper tax liability and the knowledge and experience of the                
          taxpayer.  Id.   Reliance on the advice of a professional, such             
          as an accountant, does not necessarily demonstrate reasonable               
          cause and good faith unless, under all the circumstances, such              
          reliance was reasonable and the taxpayer acted in good faith.               
          Id.                                                                         
               Petitioners' underpayment for each of the years at issue               
          results partially from their having used the reported losses from           
          petitioner's rental activity at Crestwood to offset nonpassive              
          income.28  Petitioners claim that petitioner is not a tax spe               

          28  Petitioners challenge respondent's determinations imposing              
                                                             (continued...)           




Page:  Previous  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011