- 35 - provided some services to other related entities, we are unable to find that these services were performed on behalf of anyone other than petitioner. We hold that petitioner paid the Officers the subject compensation for services that they rendered to it. 3. Conclusion Based on the above, we conclude that petitioner may deduct the $1,461,000 that it paid to Mr. Laviano, and it may deduct the $1,461,000 that it paid to Mr. Woll. In so concluding, we have considered all arguments made by respondent for a contrary holding and, to the extent not discussed above, we find them to be without merit. To reflect the foregoing, Decision will be entered for petitioner.Page: Previous 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35
Last modified: May 25, 2011