James M. Rankin and Shirley Rankin - Page 16

                                       - 16 -                                         
          United States, supra, involved a reserve for anticipated                    
          advertising rebate expenses.  The taxpayer added to the reserve             
          and deducted an amount based on its estimated liability for                 
          rebates for the year; rebates paid were charged against, and                
          reduced, the reserve.  The court concluded that the rebate                  
          reserve was an item affecting the proper timing of a deduction              
          because disbursements from the reserve would be deductible when             
          made and the taxpayer’s practice simply accelerated those                   
          deductions.  Knight-Ridder Newspapers, Inc. v. United States,               
          supra at 798.  Similarly, in the instant case, a disbursement               
          from one of the BUF accounts in issue would properly be                     
          deductible when made, Sebring v. Commissioner, 93 T.C. at 225,              
          and petitioner’s practice of offsetting payments into the BUF               
          accounts against the gross receipts of his business in effect               
          accelerated the deductions otherwise allowable.  The court in               
          Knight-Ridder Newspapers further analyzed whether the taxpayer's            
          use of the reserve permanently avoided the reporting of income,             
          reasoning as follows:                                                       
               though we talk about the timing of deductions, the                     
               basic issue is whether income is reflected and taxed.                  
               The reserve method determines when income will be                      

          7(...continued)                                                             
          taxpayers and/or claims of deductions based on estimates of                 
          expenses or reserve accounts.  Petitioners point out that                   
          petitioner was a cash method taxpayer during relevant times and             
          further contend that the payments into the BUF accounts were not            
          based on estimates of expenses, but on a percentage of bail bond            
          premiums received and that the BUF accounts were not reserves in            
          an accounting sense.                                                        




Page:  Previous  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011