James E. Redlark and Cheryl L. Redlark - Page 47

                                       - 47 -                                         

                                      APPENDIX                                        


          JEAN D. TRUE; H.A. TRUE, JR.; H.A. TRUE, III;                               
          KAREN S. TRUE; DIEMER D. TRUE; SUSAN L. TRUE;                               
          DAVID L. TRUE; MELANIE A. TRUE, PLAINTIFFS-                                 
          APPELLANTS v. U.S., DEFENDANT-APPELLEE. U.S. Court of Appeals,              
          Tenth Circuit, No. 93-8092, Aug. 26, 1994.  District Court, 72              
          AFTR 2d 93-5660, affirmed.  Decision for Govt.                              

               MOORE, Circuit Judge:                                                  

                                 Order and Judgment                                   

               Before MOORE, SETH, and TACHA, Circuit Judges:**                       
               Plaintiffs in these consolidated cases appeal from a summary           
          judgment motion in favor of the government.  They seek an income            
          tax refund claiming the IRS improperly calculated their                     
          alternative minimum tax.  They contend the correct computation              
          permits them to fully deduct as a business expense interest paid            
          on income tax deficiencies relating to their various business               
          entities.  According to their treatment of the interest,                    
          plaintiffs owe no alternative minimum tax.  Finding no legal                
          support for that position, we affirm.                                       
               H.A. True, Jr.,1 his wife, and three of their children are             
          owners of numerous ranching and energy-related businesses                   
          operated as partnerships and S corporations.  In 1986, the IRS              
          advised taxpayers to pay disputed tax deficiencies and associated           
          interest because, after 1986, interest on most tax deficiencies             
          would not be fully deductible.  Accordingly, in 1986, plaintiffs            
          (the business owners and their spouses) paid, for various                   
          previous tax years, contested taxes and penalty interest relating           
          "nearly exclusively" to their businesses.  On their 1986                    

          ** This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except                 
          under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and                   
          collateral estoppel.  The court generally disfavors the citation            
          of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may            
          be cited under the terms and conditions of the court's General              
          Order filed November 29, 1993.  151 F.R.D. 470.                             
          1 Mr. True died during the course of this litigation.  As                   
          personal representatives of his estate, his wife and the three of           
          his children involved in this case have been substituted as                 
          parties for Mr. True.                                                       




Page:  Previous  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011