James E. Redlark and Cheryl L. Redlark - Page 60

                                       - 60 -                                         
          an underpayment of income tax does not give rise to identifiable            
          proceeds received from the Government.  The temporary regulations           
          address the situation of unidentifiable debt proceeds under the             
          heading "Debt assumptions not involving cash disbursements."                
          Section 1.163-8T(c)(3)(ii), Temporary Income Tax Regs., provides:           
               If a taxpayer incurs or assumes a debt in consideration                
               for the sale or use of property, for services, or for                  
               any other purpose, or takes property subject to a debt,                
               and no debt proceeds are disbursed to the taxpayer, the                
               debt is treated for purposes of this section as if the                 
               taxpayer used an amount of the debt proceeds equal to                  
               the balance of the debt outstanding at such time to                    
               make an expenditure for such property, services, or                    
               other purpose.  [Emphasis added.]                                      
          An individual making an underpayment of tax is thus treated as if           
          she incurred an indebtedness equal to the amount of such                    
          underpayment and used the proceeds of the indebtedness to                   
          eliminate the underpayment.  Such an individual is treated the              
          same as an individual who avoided any underpayment by borrowing             
          from a third party the funds necessary to make a full payment.              
          Indeed, it is difficult to see a tracing system distinguishing              
          between those two cases without getting into the type of                    
          apportionment that tracing is designed to avoid.  The majority              
          does not distinguish between those two cases.                               
               The real question, of course, is whether interest on                   
          borrowed funds expended to discharge an individual's income tax             
          liability is personal interest within the meaning of section                
          163(h)(2)(A).  It is not, on the facts of our case, if                      
          petitioners' payments of their 1989 and 1990 Federal income taxes           
          are expenditures made in connection with the conduct of their               
          unincorporated business.  See sec. 1.163-8T(a)(4)(i)(A), (b)(7),            



Page:  Previous  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011