State Police Association of Massachusetts - Page 5

                                        - 5 -                                         
               (vii)  all checks received as a result of the solicitation             
          would be made payable to petitioner and turned over to the office           
          manager or trooper monitor on duty; any check received that was             
          not made payable to petitioner would be returned to its maker;              
               (viii)  daily reports of collected funds would be maintained           
          and submitted weekly to petitioner’s treasurer;                             
               (ix)  petitioner would maintain a separate checking account,           
          and all expenses incurred directly from the solicitation and                
          approved by petitioner and BWE would be paid from that account;             
               (x)  BWE would be an independent contractor and not the                
          agent of petitioner; petitioner would have no direction or                  
          control over BWE’s personnel or business activities, and BWE                
          would save petitioner harmless from any liability resulting from            
          BWE’s business activities; BWE could not incur indebtedness or              
          expenses in the name of petitioner;                                         
               (xi)  petitioner would provide a monitor (Trooper Monitor)             
          who would be present at all times during the telephone                      
          solicitation;                                                               
               (xii)  petitioner would provide an editing staff for the               
          yearbook;                                                                   
               (xiii)  BWE would supply the marketing personnel, but                  
          petitioner had the right to terminate the employment of any                 
          employee or subcontractor found to be using pressure or                     
          misrepresentation;                                                          






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011