Mayer and Ninette Stiskin - Page 3

                                        - 3 -                                         
          The notice of deficiency disallowed losses claimed by petitioners           
          from Opal Leasing on the ground that petitioner was not "at risk"           
          within the meaning of section 465 with respect to his investment            
          in the partnership.                                                         
               Petitioners filed their petition with this Court on                    
          September 8, 1986.  Subsequently, on March 4, 1988, they signed a           
          Form 906, "Closing Agreement on Final Determination Covering                
          Specific Matters".  The form was signed by the IRS                          
          representative, Associate Chief, NYC Appeals, on March 24, 1988.            
               Under the closing agreement, petitioners were entitled to an           
          ordinary deduction from taxable income for 1980 in the amount of            
          $6,027, "being equal to 100% of taxpayer's investment in the                
          partnership".  The agreement further provided that petitioners              
          were not entitled to any deductions of losses or credits in                 
          connection with Opal Leasing for any other taxable year.  Also,             
          petitioners would not be liable for additional interest under               
          section 6621(c) or for any additions to tax on any portion of any           
          deficiency arising under the closing agreement.                             
               The IRS did not immediately implement the closing agreement.           
          Meanwhile, there was pending in this Court a tax shelter case               
          involving facts similar to those present here, Thornock v.                  
          Commissioner, 94 T.C. 439 (1990).  In that case this Court found            
          that, as here, the initial nonrecourse financing, the guarantees            
          made to the partners by other participants in the transaction,              
          together with other features of the transaction, such as the                




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011