Mayer and Ninette Stiskin - Page 5

                                        - 5 -                                         
          initial nonrecourse financing and the guarantees made to the                
          partners by other participants in the transaction, together with            
          other features of the transaction, such as the essentially                  
          offsetting nature of the various lease and note payments.  Id.              
          The Commissioner contends that the financial structure of the               
          transaction in Opal Leasing is indistinguishable from the                   
          financial structure of the transactions in Waters for purposes of           
          section 465(b)(4).                                                          
              On March 24, 1994, the IRS sent petitioners proposed                   
          decision documents, based on the decision in Thornock v.                    
          Commissioner, 94 T.C. 439 (1990), reflecting the terms of the               
          closing agreement.  On September 9, 1994, the IRS sent                      
          petitioners a letter reminding them that they had failed to sign            
          and return the proposed decision documents and requesting that              
          they do so as soon as possible.  When petitioners did not return            
          the signed decision documents, the Commissioner filed a motion              
          for summary judgment to enforce the terms included in both the              
          closing agreement and the proposed decision documents.                      
          Petitioners filed a response to the motion for summary judgment             
          as well as their own motion for leave to amend their petition.              
          In each, they contend, in reliance upon section 7121(b)(2), that            
          "Entry of Decision in this docketed case would have the                     
          prohibited effect of setting aside the Closing Agreement".  No              
          such contention had previously been made, and petitioners' motion           
          to amend their petition seeks for the first time to inject the              




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011