- 6 - properly raised by the parties." 10A Wright et al., Federal Practice and Procedure: Civil, sec. 2725, at 93 (2d ed. 1983). Res judicata requires that the parties and their privies to a prior action that has resulted in a final decision on the merits be bound as to all issues that were or might have been decided in that action. Commissioner v. Sunnen, 333 U.S. 591, 597 (1948). Res judicata applies in tax cases, United States v. International Bldg. Co., 345 U.S. 502, 506 (1953), and a stipulated decision is a judgment on the merits for purposes of applying res judicata, Pert v. Commissioner, 105 T.C. 370 (1996). Petitioners ask us to hold that res judicata mandates that the amount of the subject deductions was not income to Mr. Sturman as a matter of law based on the stipulated decision in Corporation’s case. This we cannot do. The parties disagree on the breadth of the stipulated decision. Petitioners’ affiants allege that the Commissioner allowed Corporation to deduct the subject expenses as corporate legal fees. Respondent’s affiants allege that the Commissioner allowed Corporation to deduct the expenses as payments to Mr. Sturman in lieu of salary or other compensation. Petitioners’ affiants allege that the criminal action was related to Corporation. Respondent’s affiants allege that the criminal action was unrelated to Corporation. The resolution of these conflicting allegations presents a question of fact that must be decided by the Court as the trier of fact. See Commissioner v. Heininger, 320 U.S. 467, 473 (1943). ThePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011