- 2 - Kenneth S. Sussmane, for petitioner. Albert G. Kobylarz and Guy G. LaVignera, for respondent. MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION HALPERN, Judge: These three cases have been consolidated for trial, briefing and opinion. Respondent, by three notices of deficiency, determined deficiencies in, and additions to, petitioner's Federal income tax, as well as a penalty, as follows: Additions to Tax and Penalties Docket Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. No. Year Deficiency 6653(a) 6653(a)(1)(A) 6653(a)(1)(B) 6661 6662(a) 5780-92 1988 $168,900 $8,445 --- --- $42,225 --- 21777-93 1987 157,105 ---$7,855 * 39,276 --- 592-94 1989 44,728 --- --- --- --- $8,946 * 50 percent of the interest due on $157,105. Respondent first issued a notice of deficiency for 1988. In that notice of deficiency, respondent explained that the basis for the adjustment giving rise to substantially all of the deficiency in tax was that petitioner had failed to establish a nontaxable source for funds used in his "casino activities". Subsequently, respondent issued notices of deficiency for 1987 and 1989. The basis for the adjustments made in those notices of deficiency is that petitioner, an attorney, failed to report as income a certain fee earned by him. On brief, respondent concedes that the three notices of deficiency are to bePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011