Barry D. and Suzanne B. Whalley - Page 6

                                        - 6 -                                         
               Except for some minor items, all of the Schedule F expenses            
          claimed by petitioners were incurred in connection with their               
          horses.  For example, in 1991, petitioners deducted over $1,800             
          for the cost of veterinarian's fees and medicine, tickets to the            
          rodeo association, horse magazine subscriptions, and other horse-           
          related items.  In 1992, petitioners deducted over $13,000 in               
          connection with their horses, a substantial portion of which                
          included the cost of constructing a horse training arena, which             
          petitioners' daughter used for riding practice.                             
               Petitioner completed the equivalent of 3 years of college.             
          Before engaging in TSI and TSR, petitioner was a police officer             
          for 17 years in the City of Oakland, retiring as a sergeant in              
          1982.  After retiring from the police force, petitioner worked as           
          a Chief Special Investigator for World Airlines, where he                   
          remained for 2 years.                                                       
               For the years in issue, petitioner owned two vans, a pickup            
          truck, and a Porsche.                                                       
                                       OPINION                                        
          Issue 1. Schedule A Education Expenses                                      
               Respondent determined that for 1991 and 1992, petitioners              
          are not entitled to deduct job-related education expenses,                  
          including mileage, parking, meals, lodging, and other                       
          miscellaneous expenditures claimed by Mrs. Whalley in excess of             
          the amounts conceded by respondent, because petitioners have                
          failed to meet the requirements of sections 162 and 274 and the             




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011