Barry D. and Suzanne B. Whalley - Page 8

                                        - 8 -                                         
          requirements of the taxpayer's employer.  Sec. 1.162-5(a)(1),               
          Income Tax Regs.                                                            
               A taxpayer's general statement that his or her expenses were           
          incurred in pursuit of a trade or business normally is not                  
          sufficient to establish that the expenses had a reasonably direct           
          relationship to that trade or business.  Ferrer v. Commissioner,            
          50 T.C. 177, 185 (1968), affd. per curiam 409 F.2d 1359 (2d Cir.            
          1969). Rather, a taxpayer must maintain records sufficient to               
          permit verification of income and expenses.  Sec. 6001; sec.                
          1.6001-1, Income Tax Regs.  That a taxpayer cannot prove the                
          exact amount of an otherwise deductible item is not fatal,                  
          because generally, unless precluded by section 274, we may                  
          estimate the amount of such an expense and allow the deduction to           
          that extent.  Cohan v. Commissioner, 39 F.2d 540 (2d Cir. 1930).            
          The estimate, however, must have some reasonable evidentiary                
          basis.  Vanicek v. Commissioner, 85 T.C. 731, 743 (1985).                   
               A. Commuting  Expenses                                                 
               Respondent determined that petitioners are not entitled to             
          deduct expenses incurred for approximately 9,300 and 4,800 miles6           
          driven during 1991 and 1992, respectively, in connection with               
          Mrs. Whalley's job-related education.                                       


          6    The standard mileage allowances for 1991 and 1992 were 27.5            
          and 28 cents per mile, respectively, for all miles of use for               
          business purposes.  Rev. Proc. 90-59, 1990-2 C.B. 644; Rev. Proc.           
          91-67, 1991-2 C.B. 887.  There is some indication, based on the             
          documents submitted at trial that petitioners used the 27.5 cents           
          per mile flat rate for both 1991 and 1992 in determining the                
          amount of their deduction for business mileage driven.                      



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011