Tolbert S. Wilkinson and Suzanne T. Wilkinson - Page 12

                                         12                                           
          T.C. 360, 371 (1986).  We will consider these factors separately            
          in this case.                                                               
               1.  The Manner in Which the Ranching Activities Were                   
          Conducted                                                                   
               Maintaining complete and accurate books and records may                
          indicate that the activity is engaged in for profit.  Elliot v.             
          Commissioner, supra at 971-972; sec. 1.183-2(b)(1), Income Tax              
          Regs.  Respondent contends that the records kept here were                  
          inaccurate, contained omissions, and did not disclose the most              
          rudimentary information a prospective purchaser would want in               
          purchasing horses.  Petitioner argues that the records were                 
          adequate, that from them the C.P.A. was able to prepare                     
          petitioners' tax returns, and that they were able to assess                 
          profitability and respond accordingly.                                      
               The records consisted of handwritten logs kept since 1987              
          and typed summaries for each year.  The logs contain one or two             
          pages for each month, and list expenditures and the method of               
          payment--for instance, a charge at a gas station or cash to a               
          veterinarian.  At the end of the logs are summaries.  The                   
          summaries may not have always been accurate or complete, but may            
          have provided at best a rough picture of the profitability of the           
          ranch.  We cannot judge how accurate or complete they were in               
          this case; they were accepted into evidence solely for showing              
          that petitioner kept some kind of records, not for the purpose of           






Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011