Tolbert S. Wilkinson and Suzanne T. Wilkinson - Page 15

                                         15                                           
               Petitioners were employed full time by the medical                     
          corporation, and accordingly spent only weekends and some                   
          evenings at the ranch.  Petitioner may have not allowed polo to             
          interfere with his surgery schedule, and there was also an                  
          obvious recreational element to time spent at the ranch.                    
               The fact that taxpayers devote a limited amount of time to             
          an activity may not indicate a lack of profit objective where the           
          taxpayers utilize the services of qualified persons to conduct              
          the activity.  Cornfeld v. Commissioner, 797 F.2d at 1052; De               
          Mendoza v. Commissioner, supra; sec. 1.183-2(b)(3), Income Tax              
          Regs.  Petitioners hired Mr. White, who acted as a full-time                
          ranch supervisor.  His duties were broad, but it was clear to us            
          that he managed the day-to-day activities of the ranch.  This               
          factor favors petitioner.                                                   
               4.  Expectation of Appreciation in Value                               
               An expectation that the appreciation of assets used in an              
          activity will produce an overall profit when netted against the             
          losses from that activity may indicate a profit objective.  Sec.            
          1.183-2(b)(4), Income Tax Regs.  There is no outright requirement           
          that any appreciation offset the aggregate losses, but there must           
          be a bona fide expectation that appreciation will produce a                 
          profit at some time in the future.  See Allen v. Commissioner, 72           
          T.C. 28, 36 (1979); Engdahl v. Commissioner, 72 T.C. 659, 668               
          (1979).  Additionally, section 1.183-1(d)(1), Income Tax Regs.,             
          provides that the possible increase in the value of land used in            




Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011