J.J. Zand - Page 60

                                        - 145 -                                       

          the City of Columbus, Department of Recreation and Parks, as a              
          donation to move the house to the other side of the river where             
          it was used as a public place.  The city did not move the                   
          building until 1977.  On December 20, 1976, the City of Columbus            
          passed an ordinance accepting petitioner's donation of a single             
          family stucco house containing about 2,300 square feet plus an              
          attached garage, located at 3404 Riverside Drive, and dedicating            
          it to public use for recreation and park purposes.                          
               The depreciation schedule attached to petitioner's 1975                
          income tax return shows that petitioner acquired the house                  
          (identified as adjoining building) and land in October 1975 at a            
          total cost of $57,334.41.  The cost for depreciation purposes was           
          allocated as $27,333.41 to the house and $30,000 to the land.               
          This allocation was not challenged by respondent.  When the house           
          was donated to the City of Columbus 14 months later it had a fair           
          market value of at least $27,333.41.  The house was rented                  
          sometime during the period before it was donated to the City of             
          Columbus.  Therefore, petitioner is entitled to a charitable                
          contribution deduction of $40,333.41 ($27,333.41 plus $13,000) in           
          1976.  No greater deduction is allowed because petitioner did not           
          prove a fair market value for the house in excess of $27,333.41.            
               In the notice of deficiency for 1976 respondent determined             
          that no charitable contribution deduction was allowable because             
          the property was purchased with the intent to demolish the house.           





Page:  Previous  135  136  137  138  139  140  141  142  143  144  145  146  147  148  149  150  151  152  153  154  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011