J.J. Zand - Page 118

                                        - 198 -                                       

          of his withdrawals from those accounts.  Respondent further                 
          contends that because of respondent's concessions in connection             
          with Ingersoll-Rand payments deposited to the Diesel Power Bank             
          of America account, petitioner's withdrawals from that account              
          constitute unreported income in any event.                                  
               Respondent asserts first on brief that petitioner withdrew             
          the following amounts from the Diesel Power Bank of America                 
          account:                                                                    
          Year                Amount                                                  
          1973           $655,500.00                                                  
          1974                531,633.48                                              
          1975           1,345,766.60                                                 
          1976                665,000.00                                              
          In our findings of fact, we found that the evidence supported               
          withdrawals by petitioner from that account in amounts somewhat             
          smaller than respondent's assertion, namely:                                
          Year                Amount                                                  
          1973           $655,500.00                                                  
          1974                531,633.48                                              
          1975           601,652.03                                                   
          1976                265,000.00                                              
          Subsequently, on brief respondent asserts that the amounts to be            
          considered income to petitioner because they were converted to              
          his personal use were as follows:                                           










Page:  Previous  188  189  190  191  192  193  194  195  196  197  198  199  200  201  202  203  204  205  206  207  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011