J.J. Zand - Page 271

                                        - 83 -                                        

          Power.  Respondent now claims that only the $1,201,938.20 is at             
          issue for 1975, thus apparently conceding the alleged "Other"               
          income in the notice of deficiency.18                                       
               In the notice of deficiency for 1976, respondent increased             
          petitioner's "Per books" income from Galion by $12,845.78 and               
          "Other" income by $391,286.34.  Respondent now asserts that                 
          $390,843.54 is at issue.  During the taxable year 1976, Galion              
          paid Diesel Power a total amount of $390,843.54.  These payments            
          were deposited in the Diesel Power Bank of Teheran account and              
          were made pursuant to letters from CTC to Galion requesting the             
          payments.  None of these payments was recorded in the CTC                   
          receipts journal for 1976.  Petitioner did not include in his               
          1976 gross income any portion of the $390,843.54.  On June 24,              
          1976, Galion made a payment to Diesel Power in the amount of                
          $6,000, payable to the Diesel Power Bank of Teheran account.                
          There is no record of this amount in CTC's receipts journal for             
          1976.  Respondent appears to have conceded the adjustment in the            
          notice of deficiency with respect to the $6,000 payment.                    

          in income; therefore, we are unable to ascertain whether the specific amounts
          listed in the stipulation are correct, but we assume for our findings that  
          they are and that there was an error in addition.  Because the total amount 
          included in income is $250 less than indicated in the stipulation, the total
          amount not included is $250 higher.                                         
          18 We are unable to determine why the amount attributed to Diesel Power     
          on the CTC receipts journal of $1,202,188.18 differs from the amount at issue
          according to respondent's brief by $250.  We assume that respondent meant to
          use the "Per books" figure in the notice of deficiency.                     






Page:  Previous  73  74  75  76  77  78  79  80  81  82  83  84  85  86  87  88  89  90  91  92  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011