3-KOAM Company, A Partnership, My Hat, Inc., Tax Matters Partner - Page 14

                                       - 14 -                                         
          section 166(a), a "bona fide debt is a debt which arises from a             
          debtor-creditor relationship based upon a valid and enforceable             
          obligation to pay a fixed or determinable sum of money."  Sec.              
          1.166-1(c), Income Tax Regs.  Whether a bona fide debtor-creditor           
          relationship exists is a question of fact to be determined upon             
          consideration of all the pertinent facts in a particular case.              
          Fisher v. Commissioner, 54 T.C. 905, 909 (1970).                            
               In the case at bar, we must determine whether the advances             
          to Sue were made in exchange for a bona fide debt.  Petitioner              
          bears the burden of proof on this issue.  Rule 142(a); Welch v.             
          Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 115 (1933); Durando v. United States, 70           
          F.3d 548, 550 (9th Cir. 1995).                                              
               At trial, Paik testified that he has known Sue since 1989              
          when they were introduced through family and friends.                       
          Thereafter, the two met on several occasions.  In November of               
          1989, Paik personally applied for and received a $30,000 loan               
          from the bank, and according to petitioner's argument, advanced             
          the proceeds to Sue on behalf of 3-Koam.  In February of 1990,              
          Sue signed a $30,000 promissory note, made payable to 3-Koam.               
               We note that we closely scrutinize the form of an alleged              
          business arrangement to determine its true substance where                  
          parties have a personal relationship, such as the one between               
          Paik and Sue.                                                               
               At trial, Paik and Houston claimed that Sue received the               
          $30,000 as a loan from 3-Koam for the purpose of enabling Sue to            




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011