Sharon Lee Bartlett, F.K.A. Heitzman - Page 18

                                       - 18 -                                         

          $3,300,000--only if production for all wells drilled and completed          
          by November 1, 1980, exceeded 30 barrels per day or 2 barrels per           
          day per completed well.  Mr. Heitzman would have personally                 
          assumed $130,683 of total liability of $3,300,000 had those                 
          production goals been met.  Nothing in the record indicates that            
          any oil was ever produced from the leased acreage.                          
               In the second assumption agreement, Mr. Heitzman purported             
          to assume personal liability of up to $3,779 per unit (for a                
          maximum of $26,453) for payment of drilling and completion costs            
          incurred under the turnkey contract.                                        
          3.   Petitioner’s Knowledge of Mr. Heitzman’s Purchase of an                
               Interest in Stonehurst                                                 
               Mr. Heitzman decided to purchase an interest in Stonehurst             
          without any input from petitioner about the merits of the                   
          investment.  It is unclear from the record precisely when                   
          Mr. Heitzman apprised petitioner about the Stonehurst purchase.             
          Petitioner was aware of the purchase prior to filing the 1979               
          joint income tax return.  Regardless of when Mr. Heitzman told              
          petitioner about the transaction, he told her only that                     
          Stonehurst “was in oil and gas”, would make some money, and was             
          a “tax shelter” that would be reflected in the 1979 return.                 
          Mr. Heitzman never explained to petitioner any other aspects of             
          the Stonehurst investment as he then understood them.  He did not           
          explain to her any attributes of Stonehurst as a tax shelter,               
          such as what minimum annual royalties or intangible drilling                
          costs were, nor give her any further information on Stonehurst as           



Page:  Previous  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011