Norton M. Bowman - Page 3

                                        - 3 -                                         
          March 24, 1988, petitioner received no salary or dividends from             
          Associates.                                                                 
               Soon after its organization, Associates obtained from United           
          Virginia Bank (bank), later known as Crestar Bank, a $150,000               
          line of credit that funded Associates' operations.  The line was            
          secured by three certificates of deposit, two of which, in the              
          aggregate amount of $130,000, were in the name of petitioner, and           
          one of which, in the amount of $20,000, was in the name of                  
          petitioner's wife.  During January 1981, the bank called the                
          line, and the certificates of deposit in petitioner's name were             
          redeemed during that month and used to satisfy the indebtedness             
          (sometimes hereafter referred to as the 1981 transaction).  The             
          amount of those certificates exceeded Associates' indebtedness to           
          the bank by a few thousand dollars, and petitioner retained that            
          excess.  The certificate in the name of petitioner's wife was not           
          used to pay Associates' debt.  Associates did not obtain another            
          line of credit.  At that time, petitioner did not desire to                 
          continue building houses because the housing market was not                 
          strong and interest rates were between 18 and 19 percent.                   
               Petitioner's attorney drew up an unsecured demand note                 
          (note) that bore no interest.  The note was made on those terms             
          because petitioner did not know when improved business conditions           
          would enable Associates to resume operations.  The note was among           
          items that were subsequently lost in a flood.  Associates' assets           
          at the time that the note was drawn up included building lots and           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011