Norton M. Bowman - Page 4

                                        - 4 -                                         
          a model home that was used to demonstrate the features that could           
          be incorporated in the homes it constructed.  Associates also               
          owed $40,000 to trade creditors with respect to a house under               
          construction.  Associates' assets were otherwise unencumbered at            
          relevant times.  Associates' income tax return for its fiscal               
          year ended September 30, 1981 (1980 corporate return), reported             
          that debts due its officers increased from $3,006.86 for the year           
          ended September 30, 1980, to $126,008.16 for the year ended                 
          September 30, 1981.                                                         
               During 1982 and 1983, petitioner devoted his time to a                 
          travel business rather than to the building business, but by 1985           
          the housing market had revived sufficiently to cause petitioner             
          to resume Associates' business of building houses.  On March 24,            
          1988, Associates paid petitioner $117,164.91 of its funds, which            
          were deposited into an investment savings account in petitioner's           
          name (hereinafter sometimes referred to as the 1988                         
          distribution).  The distribution represented the proceeds of a              
          closing on a house sold by Associates.  The distribution was made           
          because Associates was doing well and did not need the money.               
          Petitioner considered that the amount of the distribution                   
          approximated the amount he thought was due him from Associates.             
          The funds were pledged as collateral for a line of credit in                
          favor of Associates.  Petitioner did not report the distribution            
          as income on his 1988 income tax return because he considered it            
          the repayment of a debt owed him by Associates.                             




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011