John J. Burke and Vivian Burke - Page 12

                                                - 12 -                                                   
            to file a Federal income tax return of her own for any year in                               
            issue.  Any tax deficiencies attributable to her could only be                               
            due to a determination by respondent that she had elected to file                            
            joint returns.  Thus, when the 30-day letter was sent, the                                   
            central issues for petitioner Vivian Burke were whether she                                  
            signed the purported joint returns, and, if not, whether she                                 
            tacitly consented to their filing.11                                                         
                  Second, petitioner maintains that even if she had availed                              
            herself of the available administrative remedies, it would have                              
            been of no consequence.  In discussing the importance of the                                 
            exhaustion of administrative remedies requirement, the report of                             
            the House Ways and Means Committee stated that                                               

                        The committee recognizes that the exhaustion of                                  
                  remedies requirement may be inappropriate in some                                      
                  cases.  For example, if a notice of deficiency is                                      
                  issued to a taxpayer in connection with an issue which                                 
                  the Internal Revenue Service has identified as one                                     
                  which it will litigate in all cases, then it would be                                  
                  inappropriate to require an administrative appeal.                                     

                  11These were the central and, ultimately, decisive issues,                             
            notwithstanding that neither petitioner nor her representatives                              
            alleged that she had not filed joint returns until Mr. Barrella                              
            entered his appearance on petitioner's behalf after the case was                             
            set for trial.  Prior to that time, petitioner had affirmatively                             
            alleged that she filed joint returns with Mr. Burke.  Indeed,                                
            joint return filing was a requirement for petitioner to prevail                              
            on her claim that she was an innocent spouse.  See sec.                                      
            6013(e)(1)(A).  Petitioner has consistently maintained, even when                            
            she alleged that the returns were jointly filed, that she had no                             
            knowledge of her husband's income-producing activities.  She                                 
            maintained this position even after amending her petition.  The                              
            amount of tax in question was never the focus of petitioner's                                
            individual position.  At trial, petitioner's counsel indicated                               
            that petitioner was not interested in issues other than joint                                
            return and innocent spouse status.                                                           



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011