Charles H. Butler and Judith K. Butler - Page 9

                                                 - 9 -                                                   

            restriction did not apply to the incidental use of water by                                  
            livestock directly at the reservoir site.                                                    
            Knauss Suit                                                                                  
                  On February 28, 1991, a lawsuit was filed in the State court                           
            against petitioners by Lee R. Knauss and Joan F. Knauss (the                                 
            Knausses), and other associated parties, to obtain an easement in                            
            a roadway bisecting the Pescadero property.  The Knauss suit                                 
            alleged, among other things, that the Knausses had been deprived                             
            of access to their adjoining property.                                                       
                  On June 28, 1993, a judgment was filed in the Knauss suit,                             
            whereby the State court determined that petitioners had acquired                             
            by the doctrine of adverse possession or prescriptive                                        
            extinguishment all right, title, and interest in the Pescadero                               
            ranch roadway.  In that regard, the Knausses were found to have                              
            no right-of-way or easement in petitioners' property.                                        
            Expenses and Other Items                                                                     
                  Petitioner husband kept a series of separate folders in a                              
            file cabinet for each line item on Schedule F.  As each expense                              
            was incurred, he obtained a receipt and placed it in the proper                              
            folder.  Petitioner husband segregated receipts for expenses                                 
            connected with the farm from those for expenses that were not                                
            farm related.  No separate checking account was maintained for                               
            farm-related expenses because checks relating to the property                                
            were infrequent.  Petitioner husband believed that he was able to                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011