- 16 -
filed November 4, 1986, the Fourth Judicial Circuit found, among
other things, that:
The plaintiff, Faye Eubanks Daugharty, has failed
to sustain the burden of proving by the greater weight
of the evidence that:
1. there was any misconduct by attorney Paul
Harden or collusion between Harden and her former
attorney or her husband's attorney, Thomas Greene,
which prevented her from presenting her case in the
divorce action;
2. there was any conduct on the part of her
former husband which prevented her from fairly
presenting her claim or defenses in the divorce action;
3. she was so afraid of her former husband that
she was susceptible to the exercise of an undue
influence over her and that she was unable to resist
the husband's control of her mind and her will;
4. her former husband exercised any undue
influence over her in any of the proceedings in the
dissolution of marriage proceeding;
5. she was prevented by any conduct of her former
husband or by the conduct of any attorney amounting to
connivance that would defeat her claim or defenses;
6. she was uninformed as to the value of any of
the property in the dissolution of marriage proceeding
but, quite to the contrary, the evidence conclusively
proved that she provided an itemized list of all of the
property owned by her former husband to her former
lawyer, John Sulik, prior to any dissolution of
marriage proceeding being instituted;
7. there was any misconduct on the part of her
dissolution attorney, Paul Harden * * *
The court denied Faye's request to set aside the Final Judgment
of Dissolution of Marriage, which incorporated the Stipulation
Page: Previous 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 NextLast modified: May 25, 2011