- 17 -
between John and Faye, and rejected Faye's request to vacate the
conveyance of her interest in the Landon Imperial Apartments.
The District Court of Appeal affirmed the Final Judgment in an
unpublished per curiam opinion. See Daugharty v. Daugharty, 547
So. 2d 636 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989).
Case No. 90-16340-CA
After Faye initiated subsequent litigation involving
essentially the same subject, the Fourth Judicial Circuit
enjoined Faye from instituting further litigation stating:
As set forth above, Ms. Daugharty has repeatedly
instituted litigation against Defendants Greene, Harden
and Daugharty raising the same allegations of alleged
fraud in each instance. In view of the prior
adjudications of this Court and of the First District
Court of Appeal, this Court specifically finds and
holds that Ms. Daugharty's actions in repeatedly making
those same allegations in numerous separate complaints
against those Defendants, individually and/or
collectively, constitute frivolous litigation and an
abuse of the processes of this Court. Accordingly, Ms.
Daugharty will be, and she hereby is, enjoined from
instituting any further litigation in the Circuit
Court, Fourth Judicial Circuit, in and for Duval
County, Florida, against Defendants John F. Daugharty,
II, Thomas H. Greene, and Paul M. Harden, individually
or collectively, without first obtaining prior written
permission from this Court.
As of the date of trial in this case, no further proceedings have
been instituted in the Fourth Judicial Circuit.
Pursuant to the Stipulation and Final Judgment, John paid to
Faye $30,000 during each of the years 1988 through 1993, and he
Page: Previous 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 NextLast modified: May 25, 2011