- 23 -
� 446 gives the Commissioner discretion with respect to
two determinations. The Commissioner first determines
whether the accounting method chosen by a taxpayer
clearly reflects income. If the Commissioner concludes
that the taxpayer's chosen method does not meet this
standard, he has the further discretion to require that
computations be made under the method which, in his
opinion, does clearly reflect income. It would be
difficult to describe administrative discretion in
broader terms.
Id. at 847.
Notwithstanding the authority conferred under section
446(b), the Commissioner cannot require a taxpayer to change to
another method where the taxpayer's method of accounting does
clearly reflect income, even if the method proposed by the
Commissioner more clearly reflects income. Ford Motor Co. v.
Commissioner, 71 F.3d 209, 213 (6th Cir. 1995), affg. 102 T.C. 87
(1994); Ansley-Sheppard-Burgess Co. v. Commissioner, 104 T.C.
367, 371 (1995); Hospital Corp. of Am. v. Commissioner, T.C.
Memo. 1996-105. Nor will the courts approve the Commissioner's
change of a taxpayer's accounting method from an incorrect method
to another incorrect method. Harden v. Commissioner, 223 F.2d
418, 421 (10th Cir. 1955), revg. 21 T.C. 781 (1954); Prabel v.
Commissioner, 91 T.C. 1101, 1112 (1988), affd. 882 F.2d 820 (3d
Cir. 1989); see also Southern Cal. Sav. & Loan v. Commissioner,
95 T.C. 35, 44 (1990) (Wells, J., concurring) (“Section 446(b)
authorizes respondent to require accounting changes that produce
clearer reflections of income, not greater distortions of
income”). Therefore, in order to prevail in a case where the
Page: Previous 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 NextLast modified: May 25, 2011