Dayton Hudson Corporation and Subsidiaries - Page 29

                                       - 29 -                                         
               E.  Petitioner's Expert Testimony                                      
                    1.  Introduction                                                  
               Petitioner relies on expert testimony to demonstrate that              
          (1) the Divisions' shrinkage methods clearly reflect income,                
          (2) respondent's method does not clearly reflect income, or                 
          (3) the Divisions' shrinkage methods more clearly reflect income            
          when compared to respondent's method.  In particular, petitioner            
          relies on such testimony to demonstrate a strong correlation                
          between sales and shrinkage, which correlation underlies the                
          Divisions' shrinkage accruals and petitioner's contention that              
          respondent's method does not clearly reflect income.  Petitioner            
          presents principally the expert testimony of W. Eugene Seago,               
          Ph.D.  Dr. Seago is a certified public accountant and a professor           
          of accounting at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State                   
          University.                                                                 
                    2.  Correlation Between Sales and Shrinkage                       
               Statistical correlation (R) is a measure of the degree to              
          which two variable quantities tend to change with respect to each           
          other.  R is expressed in a range between positive one and                  
          negative one.  A correlation of positive one indicates that the             
          two quantities change in exact proportion and in the same                   


          3(...continued)                                                             
          believe that it cannot show arbitrariness based on respondent's             
          failure to make an adjustment to opening inventory, and we reject           
          petitioner's attempt to distort respondent's method.                        





Page:  Previous  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011