- 25 - associated with Newtowne's construction of petitioner's home, infra. Meeks was not aware that petitioner received cost savings from Newtowne when he assisted in the preparation of petitioner's 1984 return. Meeks was also not aware that Newtowne acted as the general contractor for the construction of petitioner's home. (b) Saltergate I On July 30, 1982, petitioner, acting as general partner of two limited partnerships, purchased two office buildings from Newtowne for $430,000 and $50,000, respectively. The limited partnerships participated in a real estate construction project known as Saltergate Village Phase I. Petitioner received credits for syndication and consulting fees from Newtowne in the amounts of $110,000 and $10,000, respectively, which were applied to the purchase price of the office buildings. The $120,000 in credits petitioner received was not reported as income on his 1982 return. On December 1, 1982, petitioner caused the two limited partnerships to enter into separate "Market Research Analysis and Ongoing Planning [Agreements]" with Newtowne. The agreements were signed on behalf of both parties by petitioner. On July 30, 1982, petitioner caused checks to be drawn on the accounts of thePage: Previous 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011