Leonard Charles and Kaye Layne Ekman - Page 5

                                        - 5 -                                         

          produce the other parts and components that would complement the            
          enhanced engine.  The damaged engine petitioner purchased cost              
          $7,000.  Petitioner made the necessary repairs to the engine and            
          then made the necessary modifications to enhance the engine.                
          There is no dispute that petitioner reached his objective of                
          increasing the engine's horsepower.  In arriving at that goal,              
          several other modifications were necessary along the way that               
          petitioner apparently had not anticipated.  For example, with the           
          enhanced engine running at higher revolutions per minute,                   
          petitioner had to make modifications to the engine's oil system.            
          These modifications were also successful.  In addition,                     
          petitioner purchased two used Porsche automobiles.  They provided           
          the parts and the body into which the $7,000 engine was placed              
          after the engine enhancements had been completed.                           
               The $7,000 engine that petitioner modified was not intended            
          to be sold but, rather, was intended to be used for purposes of             
          making the modifications to see if such modifications would work.           
          The enhanced engine was not designed for, nor was it intended to            
          be, a finished product but, rather, was used solely for purposes            
          of making the modifications that, if successful, would be                   
          implemented on other 928 S4 Porsche engines and marketed.                   
               Respondent agrees that petitioner was engaged, during 1991,            
          in an activity that qualified as research or experimentation                
          under section 174(a).  Respondent, after issuance of the notice             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011