Leonard Charles and Kaye Layne Ekman - Page 11

                                       - 11 -                                         

          should be capitalized, and petitioners should be entitled to a              
          recovery for depreciation under section 167.  Section 167                   
          provides, in part, for the allowance of a depreciation deduction            
          with respect to "property used in the trade or business".  The              
          Court disagrees with respondent's factual premise.  The engine              
          was acquired by petitioner in March 1991, and the record supports           
          a finding that the research and experimentation was a trade or              
          business of petitioner and was conducted during 1991.  The                  
          engine, therefore, was placed in service during 1991.                       
          Petitioners, therefore, are entitled to a depreciation deduction            
          for the cost of the engine for 1991.                                        


          Decision will be entered                                                    
          under Rule 155.                                                             






















Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  

Last modified: May 25, 2011