John L. Ginger Masonry, Inc. - Page 21

                                       - 21 -                                         
          job positions he performed.  Elliotts, Inc. v. Commissioner, 716            
          F.2d at 1246.                                                               
          3. Character and Condition of Company                                       
               This factor requires us to focus on petitioner's size as               
          indicated by its sales, or capital value, the complexities of the           
          business, and the general economic conditions.  Elliotts, Inc. v.           
          Commissioner, supra at 1246.  In a relatively short time,                   
          petitioner became a top performer in a highly competitive market.           
          Petitioner maintained a high gross profit ratio.  Petitioner                
          penetrated the residential masonry market and won contracts with            
          some of the largest residential developers in the area.                     
          Furthermore, petitioner survived the economic downturn that began           
          in 1990.  Petitioner's survival was due, in part, to its                    
          financial strength and its ability to obtain work in a declining            
          market.  Ginger was the architect of petitioner's growth                    
          strategy, and he provided the tools necessary to implement that             
          strategy.  Ginger also charted petitioner's path through the                
          economic decline.                                                           


          4. Conflict of Interest                                                     
               The primary issue in considering factors indicating a                  
          conflict of interest is whether some relationship exists between            
          the company and the employees which might permit the former to              
          disguise nondeductible corporate distributions of income as                 
          salary expenditures deductible under section 162(a)(1).  "Such a            




Page:  Previous  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011