- 19 - Inc. v. Commissioner, 77 T.C. 1221, 1237-1238 (1981); (2) the manner in which the parties treated the transaction, id.; (3) whether the sale price is fixed, Clodfelter v. Commissioner, 48 T.C. 694, 701 (1967), affd. 426 F.2d 1391 (9th Cir. 1970); (4) whether a significant amount of the agreed price has been paid, Hay v. Commissioner, 25 B.T.A. 96, 101 (1932); (5) the intention of the parties, Merrill v. Commissioner, 40 T.C. 66, 74 (1963), affd. per curiam 336 F.2d 771 (9th Cir. 1964); (6) descriptive terms used in the agreement, Clodfelter v. Commissioner, supra; and (7) whether an effective date has been agreed upon fixing a specific time for recognition of the rights and obligations of the parties, id. Our analysis of the facts of this case, in conjunction with our analysis of these factors, points overwhelmingly to the conclusion that the subject sale occurred in 1989. The Stockholders' Agreement explicitly provides that the benefits and burdens of Griffin's ownership in its LRFP stock did not pass until 1989 when it exercised its put, and almost every stock benefit resided in Griffin until that time. Griffin was the legal and beneficial owner of its LRFP stock. Griffin held the stock. Griffin occupied two seats on LRFP's board of directors, an officer position, and one seat on the executive committee. Griffin would receive any dividends declared on the stock. Griffin could sell its stock to a third party. Griffin could block liquidation, stock dilution, merger, issuance of additionalPage: Previous 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011